The Science of Telepathy outlines your metaphysical framework as you argue that telepathy is an electrical, biological, and social reality that could transform how humanity understands consciousness, medicine, and ethics. What made you feel certain that your experiences were telepathic?

The way I hear with my ears, or see with my eyes I knew it was fact as I don’t doubt my five senses nor should I doubt the sixth sense.

I discovered I was telepathic and I wanted to bring the news to others. But I found out there was a great deal of resistance to making it a societal norm. That led me to discovering why and the building up of the scientific arsenal to back it up. Once I knew the science, I could prove it was fact.

The book blends memoir, testimony, and speculative systems-building. How did you decide which personal experiences to include? 

I decided what would be impactful to the reader. How I found proof or taught proof. Where there was a memory of my life where that happened. I find if you cater to the audience of this book which is how do you prove telepathy exists, you can reach people better.

Your sections on telepathic etiquette feel especially practical. What rule of telepathic conduct do you think readers should understand first? 

That being ethical and moral leads to enlightenment which leads to more knowledge on higher electronic frequencies. If you want to be fully telepathic, you need to be a good person through and through.

What do you hope skeptics take away from The Science of Telepathy, even if they do not accept every claim? 

That the scientific argument is solid. That factual information will at least lead to a different conclusion and a deeper conversation about the implications of how it affects our society will be long lasting.

Author Links: Amazon | Website