“Why Good People Are Actually Dangerous” blends philosophy, psychology, and storytelling into a fascinating exploration of morality, identity, and human behavior. Was there a particular experience that convinced you this subject needed to be explored?

There wasn’t one particular experience. It started very early in life. From the time we are five or six years old, the world constantly rewards us for being right, being successful, having answers for everything, and being obedient rather than questioning. Slowly, we begin to believe that certainty is a virtue and curiosity is optional. I believe that conditioning prevents awareness from growing. It produces people who are better at defending beliefs than exploring reality.

As I grew older, I noticed another pattern. Many of us are taught that if we are good people, life will somehow reward us with good outcomes. I believed that for a long time myself. Reality taught me something different. Good intentions do not exempt us from consequences. Reality responds to our actions, awareness, and decisions, not simply to our moral identity.

Today, that realization feels more important than ever. Technology is giving ordinary people extraordinary capabilities. A single unaware decision can affect thousands or even millions of lives. Capability without awareness can become extremely dangerous.

That is why the book brings together philosophy, psychology, and storytelling. Philosophy asks the questions, psychology helps us understand how people think and behave, and storytelling allows those ideas to become lived experiences instead of abstract concepts. Most people don’t remember philosophical arguments, but they remember stories that make them question themselves.

The book draws from numerous philosophical and spiritual traditions. Which thinkers most influenced your work?

Many thinkers have influenced me, but if I have to mention one person, it would be Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev. His influence on my life goes far beyond this book. There was a time when I struggled with depression, and I genuinely don’t know where my life would have gone without his guidance. He was the one who made me realize that I am completely responsible for everything happening in my life, not as an idea to believe, but as something to live. That single shift in responsibility and awareness changed the way I looked at myself and the world. It helped me come out of depression and eventually led me to question almost everything I had taken for granted. In many ways, this book is a result of that journey.

At the same time, I have learned from many philosophers, psychologists, scientists, and spiritual traditions. I don’t believe anyone should replace our own observation. They can point us in a direction, but ultimately we must see reality for ourselves. That’s why I encourage readers to question everything, including the ideas in this book.

How did the MIST and TRIL frameworks develop? Were these frameworks designed primarily as philosophical tools, psychological tools, or something else entirely?

They were never designed to fit into a particular academic discipline. They emerged naturally as I tried to understand how human beings actually make decisions.

I began with morality because, like most people, I assumed that morality was the right place to start. But as I observed people, including myself, I noticed something interesting. Morality, ethics, and even legality are often used after an action has already been performed. Instead of helping us become aware before we act, they frequently become ways of explaining or defending what we have already done.

If an action doesn’t fit our idea of morality, we call it ethical. If it doesn’t fit our ethics, we look for legal justification. If it isn’t illegal, we say, “At least I’m not harming anyone.” If that doesn’t satisfy us either, we compare ourselves with someone worse and say, “At least I’m not a murderer or a thief.” I became interested in this endless search for justification.

That is why MIST eventually led me to TRIL. I realized that the deeper question was not whether an action was moral or immoral, but whether it arose from awareness or unawareness. Morality, ethics, and law all have an important place in society, but they cannot replace awareness. Awareness must come before action. The role of MIST and TRIL is not to tell people what to believe, but to help them observe themselves before they act rather than justify themselves afterward.

You write that readers may not feel better after finishing the book, but they may see things differently. What would “seeing differently” mean to you?

When I say readers may see things differently, I don’t mean they will suddenly see a different world. I mean they may begin to see themselves differently. Most of us spend our lives exploring the outside world, people, careers, relationships, success, failure, but very little time exploring our own inner world. We rarely question our assumptions, intentions, fears, judgments, or the way our minds actually work.

This book tries to shift the reader’s attention inward. That inward journey is uncomfortable because it removes many of the explanations we have built about ourselves and the world. But it is also where genuine growth begins. Once people start observing themselves honestly, they often discover patterns they were never aware of before.

Ironically, that inner exploration changes the way we see the outer world. Instead of seeing only problems, blame, or unfairness, we begin noticing possibilities, responsibility, and solutions. The world itself hasn’t changed; our awareness of it has. If the book can help readers begin that inward exploration, I believe they will continue the journey long after they finish the last page.

Author Links: Goodreads | X | Facebook | Website