Only the Funny Survive explores how comedy’s greatest innovators have adapted to changing stages, technologies, and audiences, revealing the creativity, resilience, and hard-earned lessons behind the laughs. What was the inspiration for the setup of your story?

That’s a great question. I’ve asked myself that. There wasn’t a single moment I can remember. It happened within the last year or two. I had been watching older comedy films like It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad World, the Bob Hope road movies and the Marx Brothers. I was in awe of how these people had been successful for decades. And it wasn’t just the time frame. I remembered seeing many of these very funny people on TV I remembered comedy albums and I’d heard about their radio shows. Some kind of pattern-recognition epiphany happened. Why did some of these brilliant people have careers beyond film and others didn’t? I started jotting down notes on people and movies and as I read biographies (John Candy, Groucho Marx, Steve Martin, Tina Fey) it occurred to me it wasn’t a lack of ambition. There must be other factors. I began to think about what it was about radio that didn’t translate to film. Or why some stand-up comics got a TV show and others didn’t. That’s when I got serious about identifying the people and the stages.

You distinguish between “Stage Surfers” and “Stage Natives.” What determines whether a comedian can successfully reinvent themselves as entertainment platforms evolve?

Start with the obvious: without talent, none of this matters. Every “formula” has talent in it. After that come ambition, drive, work ethic and, probably, a little luck. Even then, I don’t think there’s one formula for reinventing yourself as platforms change. Three things matter. The first is range. The Stage Surfers in the book, like Tina Fey, often come out of sketch, which teaches writing, character, timing and acting. Those skills travel. The second is an instinct for the next stage, and someone, like an agent or manager, who can get you in the room. The third is fit. Dennis Miller is a brilliantly gifted comic, but Monday Night Football didn’t need Proust in the third quarter. That wasn’t a failure of talent. It was the wrong room. I think of Stage Natives as the Einsteins of comedy and Surfers as the Da Vincis. One goes deeper, the other goes wider, and neither is better. And some performers try a new stage and just don’t like it. That might be a book for a panel of talent agents, and I’d love to read it!

Jack Benny’s use of silence and W.C. Fields’ painstaking routines reveal comedy’s hidden craftsmanship. What surprised you most about how comedians perfect their art?

When I was a teenager, I saw old films of W.C. Fields juggling and decided to learn how myself. I got pretty good with three balls. I couldn’t keep four in the air— and Fields was juggling five balls! Then I watched Fields work those cigar boxes, and I had some idea of what I was looking at— a human with extraordinary hand/eye coordination with an off the charts entertainment IQ. What surprised me at that age is that the juggling “mistakes” made the act better. Most gifted jugglers would be proud to display their skills to an audience. Fields was there to amaze and entertain. He drops a box on purpose, grabs it off the floor and slides it back into the rhythm, and the recovery gets a bigger reaction than doing it right. That’s next-level craftsmanship. I think of truly great musicians the same way: there’s a gift, and then there’s the desire to entertain— the showman part of it. That’s how you make a living. Jack Benny had a gift for timing which is crucial for making people laugh. Years in front of audiences taught him how long he could let a silence go to build tension to get the big laugh. Both Fields and Benny had an antenna for the people in the room. Like all great entertainers, they develop a sense of what the room is thinking and feeling. I think my surprise is how they all seem to share that “radar.” 

Your book explores the importance of bombing, rejection, and experimentation. How might today’s algorithm-driven platforms change the way emerging comedians develop their voices?

The smartphone changed the order of things. It used to be that the room full of people was the first step. If you wanted to see yourself on tape, you needed equipment, film, developing, and editing was next to impossible. Now a young comic can film a bit, watch it back, see where they rushed the punch line, and record it again. Social media gives them a stage the same day. For a lot of comics today, the first stage is the phone, and the room with real people is more likely the second. But today’s aspiring comedians aren’t just training for a club to do their act. All the work recording on their phones is training for doing their act on camera. That’s something older comics did later— club first, learn to play to a camera second. 

Young funny people can also watch what thousands of other funny people are doing, learn from it, and get feedback from comments, clicks, or no clicks. A bit that gets no response online is a lot less brutal than failing in front of real people. That humiliation comes later, after you’ve had a chance to practice online. 

I think it’s better today. You get comfortable on camera and get instant feedback on what you are doing long before you get on stage. 

Author Links: GoodReads | X | Facebook | Website