Blog Archives
An Important Lesson
The Case Against Jasper is an allegorical mystery where a farm’s rush to judgment after a tragic accident exposes how communities distort truth when fear takes hold. What inspired you to explore human justice and mob mentality through the lens of animal characters?
The book was born out of a rush to judgement on my daughter’s part, who is age seven and arguing with her five-year-old brother and gossiping about him with her friends in the neighborhood. In order to teach both of them an important lesson, I created this theme about Jasper the squirrel and his endeavors. The story is a way to connect with them and give them an example that rushing to judgement and gossiping can have detrimental effects. Then enter Ink and Fiona, who represent intellect. Before rushing to judgment, look at the situation, study it and come to a conclusion. Ink and Fiona represented the internal intellect to look at things from all sides, test theories, and make decisions on the results. I liked the story so much that I decided to write the book.
Did you model any of the farm’s characters, like Ink or Fiona, after real people or archetypes?
Regarding real people, not really. The name Fiona is my mother’s name, so I used it in that way. Archetypes, absolutely. Jasper represents the scapegoat and those that are misunderstood. Jenny is the catalyst for the story. Others, like the group of squirrels, rabbits, etc., represent the mob. The hens, they are the hypocrites.
How did you balance the fable-like simplicity of the narrative with the weight of its moral themes?
By writing Jasper with a leaning towards gentle naivety, I allow the reader to experience injustice through the innocent eyes of Jasper. Although Jasper never fully comprehends the malice directed at him, he definitely feels it. It is this emotional honesty that preserves the purity of the fable while allowing readers to impose their own interpretations of guilt, grief, and alienation.
I think the ending leans toward restoration rather than punishment. What message did you hope readers would take from that choice?
Take any classic fable, and they typically end with punishment: the liar is caught, the greedy are undone, and the cruel are devoured by their own cruelty. Yet, The Case Against Jasper is written to break that cycle because the true tragedy of the story is born from misunderstanding, not malice. Jasper, as it turns out, never commits a crime. The crime is the community’s judgment itself. To punish would affirm the same broken logic that condemned him and would fall in line with classic fables. The stories’ true resolution must come from recognition and reparation, not vengeance.
Author Links: GoodReads
As rumors tangle like briars, a chorus of barnyard witnesses steps forward—some earnest, some opportunistic, all convinced they know what happened. Unreliable testimonies pile high: a jealous hen with a glint for shiny narratives, a rabbit fond of order and outrage, and a skittish mouse who “saw something.” With the farm on edge and a tribunal brewing, Jasper must prove his innocence before the story hardens into a sentence.
Enter Ink, the investigative ferret with a nose for hidden threads, and Fiona, the whisper cat whose quiet intuition hears what pride and fear try to bury. Together, they sift through half-truths and harvest-time politics to uncover what grief looks like when it’s weaponized—and what justice requires when the crowd wants a culprit.
The Case Against Jasper
The Case Against Jasper is an allegorical mystery set on Wildwoods Farm, where gossiping hens, nervous rabbits, and a wrongly accused squirrel turn a simple accident into a full-blown witch hunt. It begins with Jenny’s fatal fall and the farm’s rush to blame Jasper, her closest companion. From there, the story unravels like a rural courtroom drama with animals as witnesses and moral philosophers. Ink the ferret and Fiona the cat, unlikely detectives, sift through lies, fear, and half-truths to reveal that the tragedy is less about guilt and more about how communities twist truth when panic takes hold.
I found the writing to be both charming and haunting. Wilcox blends the innocence of a children’s tale with the sharp edge of social commentary. The dialogue feels lively, sometimes gossipy, and the pacing, though deliberate, mirrors how real-life rumors spread, slow at first, then uncontrollable. The tone is simple but carries a quiet intelligence, like an old storyteller who knows how to make you see yourself in the animals. Some sections are weighed down by exposition, yet the prose always pulls you back with its sincerity. The setting, rustic, quiet, full of whispering fields, feels alive, almost cinematic.
What struck me most was how human the story felt. Beneath the feathers and fur, Wilcox explores bias, fear, and the instinct to assign blame when truth is inconvenient. The farm becomes a mirror for our own world, where perception often wins over evidence. I felt anger for Jasper, admiration for Ink’s calm logic, and deep sadness for how easily the crowd turns cruel. The ending, more restorative than punitive, felt like a sigh of relief and a reminder that justice is as fragile as reputation.
I’d recommend The Case Against Jasper to readers who enjoy thought-provoking fables and slow-burn mysteries. It’s perfect for those who liked Animal Farm or Watership Down but crave something more intimate, something about forgiveness and truth in small places. It’s not just a story about animals. It’s a story about us, the way we talk, accuse, forgive, and finally, understand.
Pages: 273 | ASIN: B0FRYJLV4W
LITERARY TITAN 