In A Taste of Madagascar: Culinary Riches of the Red Island, you describe Madagascar’s cuisine as a mosaic woven from migration and cultural exchange. How does the food tell a history that more conventional historical accounts might miss or flatten?

In Madagascar, History is found on the plate. People’s migrations and trade are reflected in the food around the island.

Take rice, for example. To most, it is a simple staple, but in Madagascar, it is an anchor that connects the present to the voyagers of the past. When I look at a bowl of fragrant rice, I don’t just see a crop; I see a history of survival and agricultural adaptation that traveled across the Indian Ocean and eventually reached the Carolinas. It is a record of how people carried their lives and their tastes with them through exploration, trade, and even forced migration.

Then there is vanilla. A history book might cite Madagascar as the source of 80 percent of the world’s vanilla beans. A statistic that strips away the soul of the ingredient. But when I stood in the lush hills of the SAVA region and watched a farmer perform the “marriage”—hand-pollinating a single orchid blossom with a wooden needle—I saw the heritage of extreme patience and craft. That moment of pollination is a tactile memory of how traditions are passed down hand to hand across generations, transforming a delicate orchid into a core part of Malagasy identity. It reveals a depth of human labor and devotion that a “commodity” label could never capture.

Even at the dining table in the capital, history is being reimagined. At Chef Lalaina’s restaurant, Marais, I have tasted dishes like foie gras ravioles with vanilla and cocoa. It is a tapestry of diversity where French techniques, Asian inspirations, and local ingredients entwine to create something entirely unique. It tells a story of cultural exchange that is harmonious and evolving, rather than one of mere historical collision. While conventional accounts might focus on the isolation of an island, the food tells a story of resilience, renewal, and a shared global future.

The book’s central method is using ingredients as entry points into work, history, ecology, and identity. Which ingredient opened the most unexpected door, and which took the longest to understand beyond its flavor?

If I were to trace the paths of my journey, the most unexpected door was opened by caviar. Arriving with a mind full of rainforests, vanilla, and the heat of wild pepper, finding one of the world’s most coveted delicacies being produced in the highlands of Madagascar felt like a beautiful contradiction.

I remember sitting at Marais, Chef Lalaina’s restaurant in Antananarivo, and realizing that this sturgeon roe was a testament to the Red Island’s future. It opened a door into a world where Malagasy effort and innovation were redefining a global industry. It taught me that Madagascar is not just a source of raw materials, but a place of sophisticated creation and visionary entrepreneurs.

As for the ingredient that took me the longest to understand beyond its flavor, it is undoubtedly **vanilla**. Having spent decades in the flavor industry, I knew vanilla through the cold precision of statistics—80 percent of global production, market prices, and chemical profiles. For thirty years, it was a familiar commodity in my professional life, yet I had only scratched its surface.

The shift happened when I stood in the humid hills along the Ankara River. I was no longer a writer or a flavor expert; I was just a student with a wooden needle in my hand, attempting the “marriage” of the vanilla orchid. That tactile memory of hand-pollinating a single flower, a task that requires immense patience, finally stripped away the commodity label. I realized then that vanilla isn’t just a flavor; it is a story of human labor and traditions passed hand to hand across generations. It took a lifetime in the industry and a trek into the forest to truly “see” the bean for what it is: a fragile link between the land and the lives of those who nurture it. 

You weave deforestation, biodiversity loss, and climate pressure into the culinary narrative as lived realities rather than abstract concerns. How do you keep the environmental stakes present without letting them overwhelm the food story?

I believe that to separate the flavor from the forest is to tell only half the story. I keep the environmental stakes present by treating the landscape not as a background, but as a primary ingredient. When I write about the culinary riches of Madagascar, the ecology isn’t an abstract concern; it is the very thing that makes the flavor possible.

I often use the wild pepper, or voatsiperifery, as a bridge to this reality. I remember standing on a curve of the RN2 with Olivier Rama, who shared the “bittersweet story” of this endemic spice. The pepper grows only on vines in the high canopy of the primary forest. However, the stakes become visceral when you realize that some harvesters, driven by immediate need, cut down the entire tree to reach the berries, a practice that threatens the very sustainability of the spice. If we lose the forest, we lose this extraordinary flavor forever.

I take a similar approach with honey. When I visited the rural yards near Ambanja or the mangroves of Antsohihy, I saw how bees turn blossoms into farmers’ survival, one golden drop at a time. Each variety, whether it’s the tangy mokarana or the smoky Menabe forest hone, is tied to a specific, fragile ecosystem. The stakes remain present because they are rooted in the survival of the people and the rituals I describe.

Ultimately, I want the reader to feel that “A Taste of Madagascar” is a story of resilience. By centering the narrative on the *farmers and visionary entrepreneurs who are “giving back to local communities,” I frame conservation as an act of creation rather than just a struggle against loss. The environmental stakes are there in every bite, every scent, and every human encounter, making the “hidden cost of culinary bounty” something we can all understand through the language of food.

The book repeatedly suggests that flavor itself carries memory and history. Do you think cuisine can preserve cultural identity in ways archives sometimes cannot?

I believe that while an archive can store a fact, only a kitchen can keep a culture truly alive. An archive is a collection of static records, but cuisine is a “living thread” that pulls the past directly into the present, allowing us to taste the very survival and spirit of those who came before us.

I saw this most clearly in the work of the late Mariette Andrianjaka. She was a true cultural ambassador who acted as a bridge between the old world and the new. Her legacy wasn’t found in dusty ledgers, but in her “remarkable ability to salvage recipes and techniques” that were on the very verge of being forgotten. When she prepared a dish incorporating dried fish into a vegetable stew, she wasn’t just following a recipe; she was meticulously documenting the diverse heritage of Madagascar, the waves of migration from Austronesian peoples to Arab and European traders. A history book might list those migrations, but Mariette allowed you to experience the “complex layers of flavor” they left behind.

Then there is the story of rice. To an archivist, rice might be a commodity to be tracked along trade routes. But to me, this fragrant rice is a record of an “intricate web of migration, trade, and survival”. It carries the memory of people who moved through exploration and even forced migration, carrying their seeds and their tastes with them across continents. When you sit at a table with a bowl of this aromatic grain, you are connecting to an “anchor of Malagasy daily life” that ties the fields to the table and the past to the present in a way no document ever could.

Even the zebu, the Madagascar hunchback cattle, tells a story that transcends the written word. I remember a defining meal with Chef Henintsoa Moretti, where she served *manaramo-lotra*—a slow-cooked confit of zebu tail, tongue, tripe, and ribeye. In that single dish, she captured the “essence” of the Malagasy culinary soul. It was a timeless homage to a culture where food is ritual and renewal. These flavors leave a “permanent imprint” on us, transforming history from something we study into something we breathe and embody.

Author Links: GoodReads | Facebook | Website