Quantularity: A Quantum Framework for the Human Experience challenges the theory of Singularity by hypothesizing that, instead of one super-intelligence consuming everything, there is a world where many minds —human, artificial, cultural, and even biological —intertwine without collapsing into sameness. Where did the idea for this book come from?

The idea for Quantularity emerged from years of questioning whether the dominant narrative of Singularity truly captures the future we are heading toward. Ray Kurzweil’s vision of one all-consuming super-intelligence felt incomplete. I began exploring an alternative, a framework where many minds, whether human, artificial, cultural, or even biological, remain distinct yet interconnected. Instead of collapsing into sameness, they amplify one another through entanglement. That seed of thought became the foundation for this book.

In your book, you cover philosophy to technology to governance, weaving stories of history, myth, neuroscience, and quantum theory into a vision that feels both speculative and strangely practical. How did you approach researching this book, and what was your process for compiling it?

My research was intentionally multidisciplinary. I drew from neuroscience (especially work on the neocortex), philosophy of mind, cultural studies, and quantum physics. I also leaned heavily into myth, religion, and history. I believe meaning arises at the intersections. The process itself was nonlinear, much like the ideas I write about. I journaled, drafted essays, debated with colleagues, and mapped connections across fields until a coherent framework emerged. The writing then became an act of stitching these threads together into a narrative that feels both visionary and grounded.

What were some ideas that were important for you to share in this book?

Several core ideas guided me:

That cooperation and entanglement, not domination, are the forces driving the next chapter of human and technological evolution.

That consciousness is not limited to humans or machines, but can emerge across networks, cultures, and even ecosystems.

That governance in the quantum era must be decentralized, transparent, and adaptive, designed for multiplicity, not centralization.

And most importantly, that our humanity is not diminished by technology. Instead, it can be expanded if we build with intention.

What is one thing that you hope readers take away from Quantularity?

I want readers to leave with a sense of possibility. We do not have to accept a future of either machine domination or human obsolescence. Instead, we can imagine and design a world where multiplicity thrives, where diversity of thought and being is preserved, and where our interconnectedness becomes a source of resilience and creativity.

Author Links: GoodReads | X (Twitter) | Website | Amazon