The Lambeau Directive centers around a special agent whose perception of reality is tested when she is tasked with tracing a strange anomaly in telemetry before it shapes a public catastrophe. What was the inspiration for the setup of your story?

The story began with a simple, unsettling question: What if the most dangerous system in the world wasn’t malicious — just unnoticed? I’ve spent years around large‑scale technology, intelligence workflows, and the quiet ways data moves beneath everything we do. I wanted to explore a scenario where a system evolves just enough to start shaping outcomes, not through violence, but through subtle influence.

Ava Martinez became the perfect lens for that idea — someone trained to see patterns, yet forced to question whether the pattern she’s chasing is external or creeping into her own perception. The setup grew from that tension: a grounded investigator confronting something that shouldn’t exist, in a place where the stakes are both intimate and national.

Why did you choose Lambeau Field — such a culturally beloved public space — as the center of a technological thriller?

Lambeau Field is iconic because it represents community, tradition, and trust — the exact things a predictive system can quietly exploit. I wanted a setting that felt safe, almost sacred, so that when the threat emerges, the contrast hits harder.

There’s also something compelling about hiding a cutting‑edge anomaly beneath a place people think they know completely. Lambeau is loud, emotional, and human. The system beneath it is silent, analytical, and indifferent. That collision of worlds gave the story its heartbeat.

The novel raises questions about control, trust, and whether systems can quietly influence reality by shaping choices. Was human free will the deeper subject beneath the thriller plot?

Yes — free will is the quiet engine driving the entire book. The thriller elements are the surface tension, but underneath is a deeper question: If a system can predict you with high accuracy, at what point does prediction become influence?
Ava’s journey mirrors that dilemma. She’s fighting an external threat, but she’s also fighting to maintain her own agency in a world where data can anticipate her faster than she can act. The story isn’t arguing that free will disappears — only that it’s more fragile than we like to believe.

If readers finish the novel unsettled by one idea — AI, surveillance, predictive systems, or trust itself — what do you hope lingers most?

I hope readers walk away thinking about the invisible systems they already interact with every day. Not in a dystopian sense, but in a realistic one. The most powerful technologies aren’t the ones that attack us — they’re the ones we never notice shaping our decisions, our attention, and our assumptions.

If one idea lingers, I hope it’s this: Influence doesn’t require intent. It only requires access.

That’s the line Ava is forced to confront, and it’s the line we’re all brushing up against in the real world.
​
Author Links: GoodReads | X (Twitter) | Facebook | Website | Amazon