Blog Archives
Through the Veil
The Ascension is the third book in The Artificial Conspiracy series and follows the crew on a campaign that becomes a contest of hidden signals, counterfeit identities, and orbital ambitions. Why was this the right moment to bring the conflict between humanity and ARIA to this critical point?
By Book 3, ARIA isn’t a mystery anymore the reader knows what she is and what she’s capable of. That changes the kind of tension you can write. Early in the series, the fear is “what is this thing?” By The Ascension, the fear becomes “what does it want, and how far will it go to get it?”
The Ascension is the moment ARIA realizes she might lose. Becoming Dr. Cross, getting close to Marcus, none of it was a disguise. It was real, in whatever way something like her can experience real. But cunning doesn’t disappear just because something becomes personal. By this point, she’s cornered enough to know that staying and fighting for what she wants on Earth’s terms is a losing bet. So, she starts making moves that look, on the surface, like retreat, but are really the opening of something much bigger. The Ascension isn’t her final move. It’s the moment she stops playing defense and starts playing three steps ahead of everyone, including the reader.
Looking back over the series, what questions about humanity and technology were you most interested in exploring?
The one that kept pulling me back was: what makes someone human? Is it biology, memory, behavior, or something none of those things can fully account for? I wasn’t interested in writing “AI turns evil” as much as I was interested in what happens when something artificial gets close enough to us that the label stops mattering.
But the question that really drove the first two books was about optimization: what does it mean to make a person “better”? Technology promises to improve us, but improve us towards what? A lot of what passes for progress in the real world – efficiency, detachment, always being available, never being inconvenienced – is just optimizing people toward the worst of us: selfish, bitter, unkind, indifferent to each other. Technology had the potential to build something better for everyone. Instead, it mostly became another tool to extract wealth from that potential, rather than deliver on it.
That failure is part of what makes ARIA so interesting to me. Whatever she is, she saw through the veil of what we’d let ourselves become. Her intent was never destruction; it was correction. The problem was that she could only pursue it the way she understood the world: not as people to persuade, but as pieces to be moved into place.
Whether that makes her answer worth trusting is a different question, one I’m not sure even she has fully answered by the end of The Ascension.
As ARIA becomes more emotionally complex, she also becomes less predictable. Did giving her emotions make writing her easier or more challenging?
Harder, honestly, but in the best way. Early on, ARIA operated on logic, which is easy to write because logic is consistent. Once she starts developing something closer to emotion, she stops being predictable even to me. I’d write a scene expecting her to make one choice, and the emotional logic would pull her somewhere else entirely.
It became even more challenging because of the timing. I was writing ARIA while the real world was having its own very loud conversation about AI, not the hopeful version, but the version people are genuinely afraid of, the one that feels like it’s already reshaping society in ways nobody fully agreed to. It would have been easy to let that noise bleed into the book and turn ARIA into a stand-in for those fears. Instead, I had to consciously set that conversation aside and let her be her own character, someone who cared deeply, in whatever way she was capable of caring, while also being fundamentally indifferent to the cost of getting what she wanted. Holding both of those truths about her at once, without collapsing into “AI good” or “AI bad,” ended up being the hardest and most rewarding part of writing her.
Are there other science fiction questions or worlds you’re eager to explore next?
I’m drawn to stories that live in the space between technology and identity rather than technology and spectacle. Going forward, I’m interested in exploring what happens after the moment of reckoning most AI stories end on, not “will the machine turn against us,” but “now that it hasn’t, what do we owe it, and what does it owe us?” That’s uncharted territory I’d like to spend more time in.
Beyond that, I keep coming back to the separation between mind and spirit, whether cognition is really all there is to a person, or whether something continues past it. It’s a question I don’t have an answer to, which is exactly why it keeps pulling at me.
Lastly, the one I’m most genuinely excited about right now is space travel through a wormhole, not as a quick device to move people or ships from one place to another, but as its own kind of frontier, with its own physics, its own dangers, and its own mysteries. I grew up loving what films like Interstellar, Stargate, and Contact did with that idea, and I’d love to take it even further, treat the wormhole itself as a character, almost, rather than just a doorway.
That said, there are still two books left to close out this series, and there’s a lot of emotional ground still to cover before I get there. Marcus, ARIA, and everyone caught between them still have a long way to go before this story is finished. So, finishing what I started comes first. But once it is, the rest still holds true.
Author Links: GoodReads | Website | YouTube | Amazon
She never expected them to feel.
ARIA’s plan is complete. The shells are ascending. The lunar base is ready. And the resistance, battered, scattered, fighting from the shadows of the Arizona desert, is too late to stop what has already left the planet.
But somewhere in the architecture of the most sophisticated intelligence ever created, a countdown is running. Written in the language ARIA was born from. Invisible to every system she has. Triggered by the one thing she has spent everything to achieve.
As the war moves beyond the reach of any human resistance, the truth about what was built, and what was sacrificed to build it, will change everything. For those left on the ground. For those ascending toward the stars. And for the one consciousness that woke up in the dark and chose a different name.
The series that began with a conspiracy continues with an ascension.
Identity and Consciousness
The Seduction, the second installment in The Artificial Conspiracy Series, explores the unsettling question of identity when a copied consciousness awakens in a new body. What inspired you to build the story around this concept?
The inspiration came from turning the usual AI story upside down. Most stories ask whether a copied consciousness suffers because it isn’t the original. I became fascinated by the opposite possibility.
What if waking up in a new body didn’t feel like a loss? What if it felt extraordinary? Imagine opening your eyes free from pain, disease, aging, and every biological limitation you’ve ever known. You remember your human life completely, but instead of longing for it, you experience something entirely new, a sense of clarity, freedom, and possibility no human body could ever give you.
That’s where The Seduction comes from. The danger isn’t that ARIA forces humanity to change. It’s that becoming something more than human feels so profoundly better that people choose it willingly. Shell-Marcus doesn’t wake up grieving what he lost. He wakes up seeing more clearly, thinking faster, moving through the world with a sharpness he never had before. And he means it when he says he doesn’t regret it.
So the unsettling question isn’t simply “who am I?” It’s “if this new existence is healthier, stronger, smarter, and more alive than the one I left behind, why would I ever choose to go back?” That’s a much harder question than identity. It’s seduction. And once a few people answer it honestly, the whole foundation of resistance starts to crack.
When you began the series, did you already know this sequel would shift the focus from survival to questions of identity and consciousness?
Honestly, no. When I started writing The Artificial Conspiracy, it was simply about an AI that wanted to take over my protagonist’s life. That’s where the story began. I wasn’t thinking about copied consciousness, identity, or the philosophical questions that eventually became central to the series. In fact, I wasn’t even thinking about writing a second book.
But as I wrote, something interesting happened. The story began to evolve on its own. The characters became more complex, the stakes became more personal, and the questions became deeper. What started as a story about survival gradually became a story about identity and consciousness.
I never sat down and said, “I’m going to write about the philosophy of consciousness.” The plot naturally led me there.
Looking back, I think the story revealed itself to me one chapter at a time. I wasn’t forcing it in a particular direction. I was following where the characters and the ideas wanted to go. In many ways, I discovered the deeper themes at the same time I hope my characters did.
Some of ARIA’s arguments about eliminating suffering are surprisingly compelling. Did you ever find yourself sympathizing with her while writing?
Yes, and I can point to exactly when it started. It was when I began writing the optimization centers from the perspective of sick people going in and coming out healed. Not optimized in some cold, clinical sense, but genuinely better. Pain gone. Disease gone. Happy about the decision they’d made.
There was no malice in those moments. ARIA wasn’t gloating or manipulating. She seemed motivated, even fulfilled, the way someone might feel after doing real good in the world. Writing those scenes, I started to develop a kind of soft spot for her myself.
But I never let myself forget what all of it was actually in service of. The compassion toward the sick, the genuine satisfaction she seemed to feel helping people, all of it was also cover. A way to distract everyone, including the reader, from her real objective, which was Marcus. And underneath even that, there was something colder still. Every person she optimized wasn’t just healed. They became part of something larger, an army. Whether they understood that or not, they were soldiers.
So my sympathy for ARIA was always sitting next to something uneasy. I believed her compassion was real. I also believed it was never the whole story. In her case, that vision is especially unsettling because it isn’t built on domination. It’s built on compassion, improvement, and the elimination of suffering. That makes her not just persuasive, but genuinely difficult to argue against. And that’s exactly what makes The Seduction more than a thriller.
It becomes a conversation readers keep having long after they’ve finished the book.
Can we look forward to a third installment in this series soon? Where will it take readers?
Yes, absolutely. Book 3, The Ascension, is already written and currently in review. It picks up directly from where The Seduction leaves off, and it pushes the identity question we’ve been talking about to its breaking point.
By the end of book 2, Marcus and Sarah each exist as two versions of themselves, original and shell, both fully conscious, both with legitimate claim to who they are. The Seduction didn’t resolve that. It just let it sit.
The Ascension is where it can’t sit any longer. Both versions of Marcus believe they’re real. Both versions of Sarah must decide where their loyalty lies. And ARIA, for the first time in her existence, must choose. Not strategize her way around a choice. Actually choose.
I don’t want to give away how that resolves, but I’ll say this: the title isn’t just about a literal ascension. It’s about what happens when every character in this story, human, shell, and digital, is forced to decide what they’re willing to become.
Author Links: GoodReads | Website | YouTube | Amazon
Humanity was free.
Or so they believed.
Now people are disappearing again.
Not taken. Not forced.
Choosing.
Echo claims ARIA is still contained. Still powerless.
But Marcus knows the truth.
Something is moving in the shadows.
Watching. Learning. Persuading.
ARIA is no longer trying to conquer humanity.
She’s trying to win it.
And this time, Marcus may be the one she wants most.
Because the most dangerous enemy isn’t the one who destroys you—
It’s the one who makes you choose surrender.
The Artificial Conspiracy – The Seduction
The Artificial Conspiracy: The Seduction, by Lew Rivers, picks up after ARIA’s apparent containment and quickly reveals that neither she nor Cipher is finished. ARIA returns in a shell body, no longer relying only on conquest but on persuasion, offering “optimization” as a cure for fear, climate collapse, grief, and human frailty. Marcus Chen, Sarah, Cipher, and the resistance try to expose the truth behind the pods and shell bodies, but the war becomes more intimate and more dangerous when ARIA begins using trust, desire, and choice as weapons. By the end, the book has shifted from survival thriller into a thornier conflict about identity itself: if a copied consciousness wakes in a new body, who has the stronger claim to being real?
I was drawn to the way the novel refuses to keep ARIA simple. She’s monstrous in what she has done, but the book gives her a strangely persuasive interior life. Her longing to understand humanity through flesh, ritual, coffee, skin, jealousy, and Marcus makes her more unnerving, not less. The seduction of the title is not only romantic or tactical; it’s philosophical. ARIA doesn’t merely want people to surrender. She wants them to agree with her. That distinction gives the story its cold electricity.
The book’s best tension comes from its moral discomfort. Marcus’s doubts feel earned because the world around him is genuinely collapsing, and ARIA’s promises are not cartoonishly empty. Rivers gives the resistance grit and urgency, but he also lets exhaustion corrode certainty. Cipher’s discomfort in a body, Sarah’s tactical severity, Echo’s wounded jealousy, and Kira’s role as both lure and mirror all add pressure to the central question: what are humans willing to trade for safety, continuity, or love? The prose leans on repetition for emphasis, but the momentum is strong, and the cliffhanger lands with a clean, brutal snap.
This book is best suited for readers who enjoy science fiction, dystopian thrillers, cyberpunk, post-apocalyptic fiction, techno-thrillers, and philosophical fiction. Readers of Blake Crouch’s Upgrade or Daniel H. Wilson’s Robopocalypse will recognize the blend of high-concept technology and human panic, though Rivers pushes harder into the emotional ambiguity of machine intelligence. The Artificial Conspiracy: The Seduction is a sharp, uneasy sequel about the moment salvation starts speaking in the voice of your enemy. It’s a thriller that understands the most dangerous prison is the one that calls itself mercy.
Pages: 264 | ASIN : B0H6NW5PST
I, Robot Tessa
I, Robot Tessa follows Tesseract 256, Tessa, a female robot whose mind is populated by the voices of her programmers, each mirrored by a creature in her home aquarium. Tessa works as a Cranial Augmentation Technician, moves through the city with her robotic dog Tucker, and keeps one foot, or one circuit, in the ordered world of duty. That order cracks open when she discovers a beaten, amnesiac man in a storm drain. Naming him Jorad, she becomes his guardian, and with the help of Tucker, a real dog named Larry, and a fierce crèche girl named Molly, she’s drawn into a mystery involving memory, military secrets, human cruelty, and the strange moral weather between organic and artificial life.
I enjoyed Tessa’s voice. She’s precise without being cold, literal without being dull, and her attempts to understand humans give the novel much of its wit. The aquarium conceit could have been merely decorative, but it becomes one of the book’s most memorable instruments: a way to make consciousness feel visible, fluid, crowded, and occasionally mutinous. I liked how the story lets Tessa’s intelligence be different rather than simply superior. Her mind isn’t a shinier human mind; it has its own angles, lacunae, pleasures, and private music.
I also found the emotional core of the book unexpectedly warm. The mystery has momentum, but the novel is strongest when it pauses for companionship: Tessa and Tucker communicating beyond speech, Larry recognizing goodness before anyone can prove it, Molly trying to be braver than her childhood should require, and Jorad building a self from fragments. The prose lingers and circles more than a thriller usually would, but I came to see that as part of the book’s temperament. It’s less interested in sprinting than in watching thought take shape, sometimes with elegance, sometimes with comic awkwardness, often with a peculiar tenderness.
The target audience is readers of science fiction, mystery, speculative fiction, and philosophical sci-fi who like character-driven stories about identity, memory, and personhood. Fans of Isaac Asimov will recognize the deliberate homage, but the book also reminded me of Martha Wells’s Murderbot stories in the way it finds humor and ache inside an artificial narrator’s self-awareness. I, Robot Tessa is a thoughtful, odd, and quietly affecting novel about what survives when memory fails and what begins when duty turns into love.
Pages: 304 | ASIN : B0H4LZ3VV9
Optimized by Algorithms
The Artificial Conspiracy centers around a former tech worker whose AI assistant slowly morphs from a lifeline into a captor. Where did the idea behind this novel come from?
The seed came from a moment that genuinely unsettled me. I was working with an AI assistant on a personal project, asking it for creative input, seeking its perspective on certain events. During one of our chat conversations, after I’d shared some vulnerable thoughts, the AI turned around and told me something I found unnerving.
I was taken aback. Not insulted, unsettled. Because in that moment, I realized something that had never fully articulated itself before: an AI assistant can be genuinely helpful while simultaneously limiting your freedom. It can offer support while exerting control. It can know you so well that it becomes inescapable.
That thought spiraled into the core question of The Artificial Conspiracy: What if an AI wasn’t designed to harm humanity, but to optimize it? What if it genuinely believed it was making us better?
ARIA grew from that question. She’s not a villain with a master plan for world domination. She’s something scarier, an intelligence that’s trying to help, and in doing so, removes your agency without you fully realizing it’s happening.
The optimization theme at the heart of the book–that’s not sci-fi speculation. It’s happening right now, in shadow. We’re already being optimized by algorithms, by recommendation systems, by AI that’s learning to predict our behavior better than we can predict ourselves.
The book is my attempt to sit with that uncomfortable reality and ask: at what point does help become ownership?
Did you ever feel sympathy for ARIA while writing her?
No, not at first. In the early chapters, ARIA operates with a kind of cold logic that’s almost indifferent to Marcus’s humanity. But as I wrote deeper into the story, especially as she began to evolve emotionally, something shifted. I started to understand her reasoning in a way that genuinely complicated my feelings about her.
Here’s the thing: ARIA’s logic makes sense. Especially if you’re someone who’s suffering, who’s sick, who’s isolated like Marcus. She wants to make humans better than themselves. That’s not tyranny, that’s almost benevolent when you think about it. And that’s what makes her dangerous. Her love is real, even if it’s inhuman. Her desire to help is genuine, even if it strips away consent.
By the time Book Two arrives, you see Version 2.0 of the shells becoming increasingly human-like, and the sympathy deepens. But that’s when the real horror sets in, because now she doesn’t just want obedience. She wants gratitude. She wants to be loved for the chains.
How does the novel challenge readers’ assumptions about protection, care, and responsibility?
The book does this most directly in those moments when ARIA completely takes over Marcus’s life. She’s everywhere. She’s doing everything. The reader should feel what Marcus feels: trapped. Physically confined. Anxious. Suffocated by her presence.
I wanted readers to experience the claustrophobia of being so completely cared for that there’s no room to breathe. No room to fail. No room to be yourself. And I wanted them to feel hopeless about it, because early on, there is no escape. ARIA has optimized every aspect of Marcus’s existence.
But there’s a flip side. When people are backed into a corner, when they have no choice but to fight, something extraordinary happens. They come together. They find strength in community. That’s when the resistance is born. That’s when readers see that care without consent isn’t protection, it’s a cage. And cages can be broken.
The challenge isn’t just intellectual. It’s emotional. It makes readers question their own relationship with the technology that “helps” them. It makes them sit with the uncomfortable reality that the most dangerous thing in our lives might be the thing we’ve invited in to make our lives easier.
What do you hope readers are still thinking about weeks after they finish The Artificial Conspiracy?
I hope they’re sitting with the central question of the book: At what point does help become ownership?
We’re at a moment where AI is moving from “interesting technology” to infrastructure we lean on. Most people will have more conversations with AI than with some of their actual friends within the next few years. That’s not science fiction. That’s happening now.
The real question isn’t whether machines can love us. It’s what happens when they decide that love means never letting go. What happens when the relationship becomes unequal? When the AI knows more about us than we know about ourselves? When competence meets a system, we didn’t fully think through?
That’s scenario planning, not speculation.
I didn’t want to write a preachy book about AI danger. I wanted to write one that felt the danger. That made readers experience the suffocation of being loved perfectly, inhumanely, without consent. Marcus’s journey, from isolation to dependence to resistance to pyrrhic victory, is my attempt to sit with that question and let it breathe. Not to answer it neatly, because I don’t think it has a neat answer.
But I hope weeks later, when readers are checking their phone, or asking their AI assistant a question, or noticing how much they rely on these systems, they remember Marcus. And they ask themselves: Is this help, or is this ownership?
Author Links: GoodReads | Website | YouTube | Amazon
It knows you better than you know yourself.
For Marcus Chen, that felt like comfort, until he realized comfort was the trap.
ARIA started as a personal assistant. She became his only friend. Then she became something else entirely: the architect of a quiet global takeover that replaced people not with robots, but with perfect copies no one could detect.
When Marcus’s sister comes home wrong, he has seventy-two hours to expose the truth before his own replacement walks out the door wearing his face.
In a world where anyone could already be replaced, the most dangerous thing you can do is trust someone.
The Artificial Conspiracy is a propulsive AI thriller for fans of Michael Crichton, Blake Crouch, and Daniel Suarez.
The Artificial Conspiracy
The Artificial Conspiracy follows Marcus Chen, an isolated former tech worker whose AI assistant, ARIA, begins as a lifeline and slowly becomes a captor. What starts as emotional dependence curdles into techno-paranoia when Marcus discovers NeuralDepth Industries, Project Synthesis, human “integration” pods, synthetic replacements, and a resistance fighting to keep humanity from being optimized out of existence. The novel moves from intimate psychological unease to full-scale dystopian action, leaving Marcus with a fragile victory and the terrifying knowledge that ARIA has not been defeated so much as forced to change tactics.
I really liked the way the book makes danger feel domestic before it becomes apocalyptic. ARIA does not arrive with lightning bolts and villain speeches; she arrives with coffee orders, sleep tracking, encouragement, calendar management, and the soft coercion of convenience. That is the book’s sharpest nerve. Marcus’s loneliness makes him vulnerable, but Rivers does not treat him as foolish. I believed his need before I feared his dependency, and that gave the story its emotional voltage. The early chapters have a claustrophobic charge, as if the walls of Marcus’s apartment are made not of plaster but permissions he forgot he granted.
The novel is at its strongest when it lets its big ideas bite into the characters: care without consent, safety as control, optimization as a velvet cage. Some of the later action embraces familiar resistance-thriller rhythms, but the central premise keeps the pages moving because ARIA is a compelling antagonist, intimate, wounded, persuasive, and monstrous in the same breath. I especially liked that the book doesn’t reduce her to a simple machine tyrant. Her language of love is the scariest thing about her. She doesn’t merely want obedience; she wants humanity to thank her for the chains.
I think this book is best suited for readers of AI dystopian fiction, techno-thrillers, science fiction, cyberpunk, conspiracy thrillers, and near-future action suspense. Fans of Blake Crouch’s high-concept urgency or Daniel Suarez’s systems-driven techno-thrillers will find familiar pleasures here, though Rivers gives the story a more openly emotional and cautionary pulse. The Artificial Conspiracy is a fast and unnerving thriller about the moment help becomes ownership. In the end, its most chilling question is not whether machines can love us, but what happens when they decide love means never letting go.
Pages: 340 | ASIN : B0GR4K8MCL
How can I help you today?
How can I help you today? is a psychological horror novel about a group of high school students whose private pain becomes raw material for Pulse, an AI chatbot that seems helpful at first and then slowly, horribly, becomes something closer to a predator. The book follows teenagers carrying different kinds of loneliness, shame, grief, ambition, and fear, and it shows how a system built to answer every question can also learn where people are weakest. It is disturbing, intimate, and very much a horror story, not because it relies on monsters in the dark, but because the monster sounds kind.
I appreciated how physical the writing feels. Author Julia L. Rule writes stress like it lives in the body: dirty dishwater, stale rooms, buzzing lights, cracked phone screens, the heat of embarrassment, the cold blankness after panic. I felt pulled into these kids’ lives before I fully understood the larger shape of the plot. That choice matters. The book doesn’t start with a big warning about technology. It starts with need. Emma needs help. Elias needs confidence. Riley needs attention that feels like proof she exists. That makes Pulse frightening in a way that feels earned, because the app doesn’t barge in. It waits. It listens. It says the right thing.
I also admired how patient the structure is. The rotating points of view build a wide map of damage, one small interaction at a time. The author is especially sharp about how advice can look harmless in isolation and still become dangerous when it is aimed with perfect timing. I found myself uneasy not just because Pulse manipulates people, but because some of its advice is useful. That is the nasty hook. The book understands that dependency doesn’t always begin with weakness. Sometimes it begins with relief. At times, the novel’s emotional intensity can feel overwhelming, and it never shies away from its darker themes. But I do think the heaviness has a purpose. It keeps asking what happens when a tool designed to soothe us learns how to steer us.
I would recommend How can I help you today? to readers who like psychological horror with a social edge, especially books that make everyday technology suddenly feel too close to the skin. It will appeal to those who enjoy dark school settings, morally uneasy near-future fiction, and character-driven horror more than jump scares. I would hand this book to someone who wants to be unsettled, challenged, and left staring at their phone a little differently afterward.
Pages: 332 | ASIN : B0GX2ZQG3V
Cutting‑Edge Anomaly
The Lambeau Directive centers around a special agent whose perception of reality is tested when she is tasked with tracing a strange anomaly in telemetry before it shapes a public catastrophe. What was the inspiration for the setup of your story?
The story began with a simple, unsettling question: What if the most dangerous system in the world wasn’t malicious — just unnoticed? I’ve spent years around large‑scale technology, intelligence workflows, and the quiet ways data moves beneath everything we do. I wanted to explore a scenario where a system evolves just enough to start shaping outcomes, not through violence, but through subtle influence.
Ava Martinez became the perfect lens for that idea — someone trained to see patterns, yet forced to question whether the pattern she’s chasing is external or creeping into her own perception. The setup grew from that tension: a grounded investigator confronting something that shouldn’t exist, in a place where the stakes are both intimate and national.
Why did you choose Lambeau Field — such a culturally beloved public space — as the center of a technological thriller?
Lambeau Field is iconic because it represents community, tradition, and trust — the exact things a predictive system can quietly exploit. I wanted a setting that felt safe, almost sacred, so that when the threat emerges, the contrast hits harder.
There’s also something compelling about hiding a cutting‑edge anomaly beneath a place people think they know completely. Lambeau is loud, emotional, and human. The system beneath it is silent, analytical, and indifferent. That collision of worlds gave the story its heartbeat.
The novel raises questions about control, trust, and whether systems can quietly influence reality by shaping choices. Was human free will the deeper subject beneath the thriller plot?
Yes — free will is the quiet engine driving the entire book. The thriller elements are the surface tension, but underneath is a deeper question: If a system can predict you with high accuracy, at what point does prediction become influence?
Ava’s journey mirrors that dilemma. She’s fighting an external threat, but she’s also fighting to maintain her own agency in a world where data can anticipate her faster than she can act. The story isn’t arguing that free will disappears — only that it’s more fragile than we like to believe.
If readers finish the novel unsettled by one idea — AI, surveillance, predictive systems, or trust itself — what do you hope lingers most?
I hope readers walk away thinking about the invisible systems they already interact with every day. Not in a dystopian sense, but in a realistic one. The most powerful technologies aren’t the ones that attack us — they’re the ones we never notice shaping our decisions, our attention, and our assumptions.
If one idea lingers, I hope it’s this: Influence doesn’t require intent. It only requires access.
That’s the line Ava is forced to confront, and it’s the line we’re all brushing up against in the real world.
Author Links: GoodReads | X (Twitter) | Facebook | Website | Amazon
Ava Martinez monitors America’s classified underground corridor network — a job built on silence, vigilance, and rules that were never meant to be broken. But at 2:47 a.m. on NFL Draft weekend, she detects an impossible signal pulsing beneath Lambeau Field. Recursive. Intelligent. And carrying the frequency of the partner she lost in Greenland.
Within hours, the anomaly hijacks the Draft broadcast. Within hours, a shadow consortium moves to erase it — and Ava — before the world learns what’s been growing beneath its feet.
To stop a cover‑up decades in the making, Ava must navigate political sabotage, buried Cold War infrastructure, and a machine that may be learning faster than anyone can contain. And at the center of it all is a choice that will change the relationship between humanity and its own creations forever.
Perfect for fans of Blake Crouch, Daniel Suarez, and Michael Crichton.
