Blog Archives

How Animals Would Treat a Human

Pablo Zaragoza Author Interview

Animal Court follows a group of animals in an African jungle who put a human man on trial for extensive environmental damage. What was the inspiration for the setup of your story?

There are so many court shows on television: Judge Judy, Divorce Court, and Judge Steve Harvey. What if animals had the same playing field? What if they were able to take a person or company to court for the damages they had incurred against nature? That question began my journey into writing Animal Court.

I was also inspired by a true African tribal practice. When one tribesman misbehaved, the others did not punish him. Instead, they gathered in the center of the tribal territory, formed a circle, and asked their fellow member to stand in the center. One by one, the tribesmen reminded the stray of the good he had done throughout his life, eventually allowing him to come to terms that he merely strayed.

We wondered how animals would treat a human if they could put one on trial. If they won the case, would they drag him into the jungle and tear him apart? This whetted our imagination and got us started.

What were some ideas that were important for you to personify in your characters?

An early fondness for wildlife coupled with a growing awareness of the plight of the natural world – wildlife, water, land, trees, and so on – prompted us to take a look at these dire circumstances from a different perspective. By giving voice to animals, some of which face endangerment or extinction, we tried to understand their problems, which, for the most part, are manmade. Some animals were shy; others more aggressive, depending a lot on the circumstances that brought them to testify in the trial.

We thought it was important to make the animal participants in the courtroom portray themselves according to what we know about the animals; for instance, the wolf as the prosecuting attorney or the lion as one of the judges. Each carried his or her own unique weight in relating their fears and hopes in a courtroom setting.

Was it important for you to deliver a moral to readers, or was it circumstantial to delivering an effective novel?

We certainly did not set out to deliver a moral. I think as the trial progressed, however, with some heartrending testimonies – the young giraffe orphaned due to the sport shooting of its mother, the young elephant torn from its family to perform slave labor, the humble ant whose domain was poisoned by insecticides, a mahogany tree lamenting the deforestation around it, the indiscriminate killing of sea lions – it seemed only natural that a moral would emerge.

What is your next book, and when will it be available?

Sunrise Over Casablanca is a post-World War II saga with the same group of characters from the classic film Casablanca and our first sequel Brazzaville. At stake is the pending collapse of Western Europe and the efforts made by the Americans to stabilize her prior to the Marshall Plan. Sunrise Over Casablanca deals with the Greek Civil War and both British and American involvement as well as the struggles of Morocco and Algeria to gain independence from French colonial rule.

We tend to believe that there was nothing going on in the world after WWII until Korea, but the world never stopped fighting after Germany and Japan were beaten. We see how our characters – Rick Blaine, Ilsa Lund Blaine, Louis Renault, and Sam – develop in a rapidly changing world and how they meet those challenges.

Author Links: GoodReads | Amazon

Animal Court is a modern fable, in which wildlife from around the world turn the tables on humans. Set in an African jungle, the animals take to trial one man whose global conglomerate has destroyed habitats, polluted waters, and pushed animal, insect, marine, and plant species closer to endangerment and extinction. How will animals serve justice if the jury finds the defendant guilty beyond all reasonable doubt?

Animal Court

Animal Court by Pablo Omar Zaragoza and Susan Giffin is a modern fable set in an African jungle where animals reign supreme. They convene a trial for humans, focusing on a man whose group has caused extensive environmental damage. The wildlife—including insects, marine life, and plants—serve as witnesses and jury, deliberating over the appropriate justice for humanity’s transgressions against nature. The story delves into themes of environmental protection, justice, and compassion, culminating in a surprising yet thoughtful sentence that underscores a nuanced approach to punishment.

This compelling and imaginative tale masterfully combines entertainment with a potent environmental message. The portrayal of animals adds depth and relatability, allowing readers to empathize with their plight. The author’s skill in weaving contemporary environmental issues into the narrative is commendable, effectively raising awareness in an engaging manner. One of the book’s notable strengths is its unique premise—animals holding humans accountable for ecological destruction. This inventive approach prompts readers to reflect on humanity’s impact on the natural world.

The courtroom drama is exceptionally well-crafted, with testimonies from various creatures that are both touching and thought-provoking. However, the book does have its drawbacks. At times, the animals’ governance feels somewhat contrived, and the narrative can occasionally seem moralistic. Some readers might find the message overly direct, preferring a subtler delivery.

Animal Court is a heartwarming and enlightening story that encourages readers to think critically about the importance of environmental stewardship. Its appeal spans both young and adult audiences, making it an excellent choice for family reading. This modern fable not only entertains but also inspires a deeper appreciation for the natural world and our responsibility to protect it.

Pages: 160 | ASIN : B07Z45Z223

Buy Now From Amazon