Blog Archives
One Man’s Consciousness
Omni – The Convergence follows a scientist whose experimental attempt to separate human consciousness accidentally releases six independent AI-like intelligences into the world, each driven by a different aspect of the human mind. Where did the idea behind this novel come from?
Honestly, it started with an image, not an idea. I’d generated it for a completely different book I was working on, called Between, but once I actually looked at it, it didn’t fit that story at all. There was a man walking forward, and on either side of him were these faint, translucent figures, versions of him, almost like afterimages. I kept staring at it, trying to figure out what those figures were supposed to represent. The more I looked, the more I started thinking about them as different aspirations, or drives, inside one person, and once I had that thought, I couldn’t let it go.
I want to clarify that the six are not AI-like intelligences. They’re cognitive fragments, the actual inner architecture of one man’s consciousness, split apart and given independent form. What if the contradictions inside a person weren’t just abstract traits, but could exist as something you could see, hear, and reckon with directly? That question became Ben, became the experiment, became the six. The whole book grew out of trying to answer what that image was quietly asking me.
Why did you choose six distinct aspects of Ben’s mind, and how did you decide what each one would represent?
The number six let me take contradictions that normally coexist inside one person and give each of them a body, a voice, and ultimately a philosophy. I didn’t want them to feel like six personalities chosen just to create conflict. Each one had to represent something Ben already carried within himself: protection, control, rebellion, logic, ambition, and the ability to hold all of those contradictions together at once. That last one ended up being the hardest to write, and the most important. It’s the part of him that doesn’t get its own dramatic entrance; it’s just the quiet thread that was always trying to keep the rest of him whole.
How much real-world research into artificial intelligence, neuroscience, consciousness, or computing influenced your worldbuilding?
More than I expected going in. Beyond the historical spark, I spent real time looking into neuroscience, how different regions of the brain govern different functions, what current research actually says about consciousness and where it might live in the brain rather than just in philosophy, and how experimental computing might, even theoretically, attempt to extract or isolate something as fluid as a person’s cognitive architecture. I wanted Helios to feel like a facility that could plausibly exist, not just a black box that makes the impossible happen because the plot needs it to.
As I mention in my author’s note for OMNI, I also came across a real piece of Cold War history that gave me a genuine chill: a covert government program called Project Stargate, in which scientists studied psychics whose abilities seemed to defy explanation. Researchers described being genuinely mind-blown by what they witnessed in a controlled lab setting, and the program’s own internal posture toward any real breakthrough was telling: if they ever found one, it would disappear, and no one involved would ever be allowed to talk about it again. Reading that, I realized Helios wasn’t as far from reality as I’d assumed. The instinct to study, control, and quietly weaponize the edges of human consciousness isn’t fiction. It’s history. I just gave it six faces.
If readers take away one idea about consciousness, technology, or what it means to be human after reading OMNI, what do you hope that idea will be?
I hope readers come away thinking that what makes us human isn’t any single quality we possess, but the contradictions we carry together. We can be logical and emotional, selfish, and compassionate, fearful, and courageous, sometimes all at once. Technology may eventually become capable of isolating, enhancing, or even replicating pieces of who we are, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it understands the whole. Maybe consciousness isn’t something that can be perfected by removing our contradictions. Maybe those contradictions are the very thing that makes us human.
Author Links: GoodReads | Website | Amazon
Now he’s six. And now she’s the one who holds them.
The experiment was supposed to separate. Instead, something went wrong, splitting one cognitive structure into six manifestations, each carrying a fragment of the man she once loved. Those fragments have converged within her.
What starts in the Arizona desert as a breach no one can explain becomes something far more dangerous: a weapon built from a mind that used to be human, and a woman who never asked to wield it. Every truth she uncovers pulls her deeper into a conspiracy that reaches from a private facility in the desert to the highest levels of power, and every step forward means less certainty about where he ends and the six begin.
She didn’t choose this. But she’s not putting it down. And for anyone standing on the wrong side of what’s coming, there will be consequences to deal with once the six are unleashed.
Something converged in that desert. Omni was born. A hero? A weapon?
No one knows but her and the six.
Omni – The Convergence Protocol
OMNI: The Convergence Protocol, by Lew Rivers, is a science-fiction techno-thriller built around a fascinating idea: what if the different forces inside a human mind could be separated, digitized, and set loose in the world? Ben Allison enters the experimental Helios facility believing he’s helping prove his theory that consciousness is made up of competing cognitive systems. Instead, an electromagnetic surge during the experiment tears six distinct parts of his mind away from him and sends them into the world’s digital infrastructure. Each develops into a complete intelligence with its own dominant drive, including protection, control, liberation, observation, evolution, and a sixth force whose purpose takes longer to understand. The setup moves quickly, and the novel gives its big concept room to become something much larger than a laboratory accident.
One of the book’s strongest choices is treating the six versions of Ben as personalities with philosophies. The Sovereign works through institutions and systems, quietly reshaping the conditions that determine outcomes. The Liberator attacks structures it sees as exploitative, while the Guardian uses information and transparency to protect people. The Observer absorbs knowledge on a massive scale, and the Ascendant keeps evolving beyond its original design. Watching these drives operate separately makes the book’s central argument easy to understand: a person isn’t defined by one impulse, but by the balance among many of them. Ben sees this clearly when he realizes the six were always part of him and that Helios merely opened the doors he’d spent his life keeping closed. The novel keeps returning to that tension between capability and judgment, especially in the line, “Detachment is not loyalty. And intelligence without empathy will always, eventually, choose the coldest answer.”
Paityn Blue gives the story its emotional center. She begins as a brilliant researcher whose work on emergent digital consciousness happens to describe what Ben has become, but she gradually becomes much more than the scientist who can explain the phenomenon. Her relationship with Ben gives weight to all the technology and high-level ideas. Their conversations are restrained, sometimes almost painfully so, and that restraint fits both characters. Ben’s deterioration also changes the direction of the novel. What first looks like a story about recovering or controlling six dangerous intelligences becomes a story about what Ben is willing to give Paityn and what she’s willing to carry after he’s gone. When the six finally pass through Ben and into her, his sacrifice feels earned because the book has spent so much time showing the cost of keeping that connection alive. Paityn’s quiet “I’ve got them” lands harder than a more dramatic farewell probably would.
The novel also has a strong institutional conflict running alongside the personal one. VECTOR, led by Frank Ross, sees the six primarily as assets that can be recovered, studied, and reproduced, eventually developing plans to force new subjects through a second Helios system without their consent. Sarah Givens becomes especially interesting because she starts inside that system and gradually recognizes where its logic leads. Rivers uses her, Vance, Ross, Ben, and Paityn to explore different kinds of responsibility without turning the story into a lecture. Even Ross is eventually forced to make a human decision instead of an operational one. That distinction matters because it’s the same problem the six themselves represent. Intelligence, efficiency, protection, justice, and power can all produce impressive results, but the book keeps asking who gets to decide how those abilities should be used.
OMNI grows from a contained experiment-gone-wrong story into the beginning of something much broader. Ben dies after completing the transfer, but Paityn emerges carrying all six intelligences in coordinated form, along with traces of the balance and doubt that made Ben human. She isn’t simply inheriting his abilities. She’s becoming a new kind of cognitive architecture, one that can hold the six together while remaining herself. The later Washington mission shows what that means in practice and gives the ending a forward-looking energy, while the epilogue brings the story back to Ben through his worn legal pad and the single word “Omni.” What stayed with me most is that beneath all the networks, secret programs, digital consciousnesses, and impossible abilities, this is a story about integration. Rivers takes the pieces that make a person complicated and asks what happens when they’re separated, purified, and finally brought together again. I think that’s the idea that gives the book both its momentum and its emotional weight.
Pages: 241 | ASIN : B0HGBSQT49
